Monday, December 10, 2012

Lit Analysis #2 "The Devouring"


  “The Devouring” is a charming tale about a Teenage girl named Reggie and her encounter with terrifying creatures known as Vours. These are nightmarish creatures that feed off the fears of humans and are able to take control of their bodies. The worst part is you can’t tell the difference between Vours and normal people. When Reggie unleashes the evil of the Vours during the winter solstice and they take control of her little brother it’s up to her to save him from the nightmare realm known as the Fearscape. The overall theme of the novel is that even the darkest of fears can be conquered with a strong will. Throughout the entire novel the author keep s and extremely dark and grotesque tone. Rarely does it stray from this. For instance when Reggie first enters the Fearscape in her brother’s mind she finds herself in a twisted carnival, where the author goes on to describe the children in this place, and there is a very detailed description of maggot infested, horrifying faces.

  Reggie is described right off the bat as an awkward teenage girl with messy hair and not too much going on in the looks department.  However a lot of the time the reader is given a lot of little tidbits about her through her actions and interests. For example she a maternal nature due to her mom leaving her family, this is explained by the way she treats her brother. No the authors syntax and diction basically stays the same when revolving around the human characters however whenever a Vour is encountered the language takes on an extremely cold a nature. Reggie changes drastically   between the beginning and end. During the beginning Reggie is described as an introverted cowardly girl who kept to herself and buried her nose in horror novels, but by the end she is a brave, strong individual who isn’t afraid to speak her mind. By the end of the novel this is one of the few times I came away feeling the characters as real people because they were written so realistically there for allowing me to connect with them because of their relate ability.  

Lit Analysis #1 "Kafka on the Shore"



“Kafka on the shore” follows the journey of both the fifteen year old Kafka who runs away from home on a mission to find his lost mother and sister, and the elderly Nakata who as a child slipped into a coma and came out with the strange ability to communicate with cats. The entire book is something of a modern retelling of the Greek tragedy Oedipus Rex. There were two main themes that this book had one of them is breaking the molds that run your very existence allows you to live and discover the vast world around you and sometimes expectations don’t match up with reality. Haruki Murakami I believe wrote this novel to allow the reader to introspectively look and compare their own lives with the twisted nature of the characters. The tone of the novel jumps many different times thought but I think I keeps a somber yet misty tone stream lined throughout.

While introducing the two main characters the author uses two kinds of characterization, direct and indirect. Towards the beginning he explains the generally look of Kafka and Nakata.  He States ages and other features to key the reader in to who they might be imagining in their heads. But the author does something clever when it comes to how he indirectly characterizes them. With things such as when he mentions they’re in japan unless stated otherwise the reader can assume that the characters are of Asian descent, another instance can be when Kafka first reaches the library the way the character takes it all in and enjoys the literature around him really shows the reader who he is. Come to think of it both the syntax and diction changes subtly when switching between the characters. In chapters where the focus is Nakata the language is a lot more whimsical, and when on Kafka the diction is much more colorful and descriptive.  Kafka is a mix between a static and dynamic character its strange to say nut he is about 50-50 in both what I mean is he is static in his actions and reactions to things but his way of thinking and looking at things is completely changed from beginning to end. Unfortunately the way my mind works it keeps fiction fiction and reality reality so I came away from the novel only having read a character however it is one of the better things I have ever read and connected with on such an eye opening and intellectual  level.




Sunday, October 21, 2012

rEmiX take 2

OK so this is the correct one this time please leave a post or two really appreciate it thanks.

Side note

My mistake i thought we were supposed to analyze part 3 not the syllioqy my bad

rEmiX

Ok so this is a short little vid for my assignment in class not much but i cuts to the point

Monday, September 17, 2012

Vocab list #6

1.Obsequious-Obedient or attentive to an excessive or servile degree.
- the secretary was obsequious
2.Beatitude-Supreme blessedness.
-the pope bestows beatitude to his followers
3.Bete noire: a person or thing especially disliked or dreaded; bane
-homework is the bete noir of my exsistance
4.Bode-to be an omen of; portend; The storm clouds bode inclement weather ahead.
5.Dank- unpleasantly moist, damp and, often, chilly
-foggy mornings are often dank
5.Ecumenical- universal
-love is a ecumenical feeling
6.Fervid: heated or vehement in spirit, enthusiasiastic
-football players are often fervid before a game
7.Fetid-stinking
- the zombie had a fetid odor
8.Gargantuan-large, monolithic
-the Goliath sign at six flags is gargantuan
9.Heyday-height, in prosperity, successful time
-seniors are in the heyday of high school
10.Incubus-demon impish appearance/actions
-an incubus is the male version of a succubus
11.Inveigle- to entice or lure by flattery or artful talk
12.Kudos- honor, glory, congratulations
-my class offered me kudos for turning 18
13.Lagniappe-Something given as a bonus or extra incentive
-for getting a discount card they threw in a bunch of  lagniappe
14.Prolix-Using or containing too many words
-my essays are often prolix in length
16.Prototype- A first or original model of something
- the prototype robot malfunctioned and killed someone
17.Sycophant-A self serving flatterer
18.Tautology- The saying the same thing twice in different word
19.Truckle-Submit or give in
- after the reinforcements came to army truckled to their enemy

Monday, September 10, 2012

Vocab #5 9/10-9/14

1.Acumen- The ability to make good judgments and quick decisions
2.Adjudicate-Make a formal judgment or decision about a problem or disputed matter
3.Anachronism- something or someone that is not in its correct historical or chronological time
4.Apocryphal-false
5.Disparity-lack of similarity or equality:difference
6.Dissimulate-to disguise or conceal under a false appearance; dissemble:
7.Empirical-provable or verifiable by experience or experiment
8.Flamboyant-strikingly bold or brilliant; showy
9.Fulsome-offensive to good taste, especially as being excessive; overdone or gross
10.Immolate-to kill as a sacrificial victim, as by fire; offer in sacrifice
11.Imperceptible-not perceptible; not perceived by the senses
12.Lackey-a servile follower;underling
13.Liaison-a person who initiates and maintains such a contact or connection
14.Monolithic-characterized by massiveness,invulnerability
15.Mot juste-the exact/appropriate word
16.Nihilism-total rejection of established laws and institution
17.Patrician-a person of noble or high rank
18.Propitiate-to make favorably inclined; appease
19.Sic-Set a dog or other animal on (someone or something).
20.Sublimate: purified or exalted
 

Tuesday, August 28, 2012

Vocab list 8/28-8/31

1.Accolade: any award, honor, or laudatory notice:
2.Acerbity: harshness or severity, as of temper or expression:
3.Attrition: a wearing down or weakening of resistance, especially as a result of continuous pressure or harassment:
4.Bromide: a platitude or trite saying; a person who is platitudinous and boring:
5.Chauvinist: a person who is aggressively and blindly patriotic, especially one devoted to military glory; a person who believes one gender is superior to the other, as a male chauvinist  or a female chauvinist:
6.Chronic: continuing a long time or recurring frequently:
7.Expound: to set forth or state in detail; to explain;
8.Factionalism: of a faction  or factions:
9.Immaculate: free from fault or flaw; free from errors; spotless, clean:
10.Imprecation: the act of imprecating; cursing:
11.Ineluctable: incapable of being evaded; inescapable:
12.Mercurial: changeable; volatile; fickle; flighty; erratic:
13.Palliate: to relieve or lessen without curing; mitigate; alleviate:
14.Protocol: the customs and regulations dealing with diplomatic formality, precedence, and etiquette;
15.Resplendent: shining brilliantly; gleaming; splendid: T
16.Stigmatize: to set some mark of disgrace or infamy upon:
17.Sub-Rosa: confidentially; secretly; privately:
18.Vainglory: excessive elation or pride over one's own achievements, abilities, etc.; boastful vanity:
 19.Vestige: a mark, trace, or visible evidence of something that is no longer present or in existence
20.Volition: the act of willing, choosing, or resolving; exercise of willing:

Collaberative Beowulf Questions

These questions were collaborated on by (Hayden Robel, Paplo Nicasio, and Torre Reddick)
[Prologue: The Rise of the Danish Nation] (lines 1-85, pp. 33-34)
  1. Shield became ruler as a common, actually orphaned at birth, man. Eventually shield surpassed his limitations to become one of the most powerful and magnanimous rulers of the lands, his reign ending as it began, departed out to sea on top of a venerated shield. Hrothgar is the son of Shield’s son’s (Beow) Halfdane. Familial order follows: Sheafson-then Beow-then Halfdane-ending with Hrothgar.
[Heorot is Attacked] (lines 86-188, pp. 34-36)
1.  The magnificent mead hall titled “Heorot” was Hrothgar’s monument/tribute to his kingdom. For a time peace was enjoyed until the demon-monster Grendel attacked the hall (for “12 winters”=12 years) the Danes ultimately failing to subdue the monster even after deploying the greatest of their men.
[The Hero Comes to Heorot] (lines 189-490, pp. 36-42)
1. Beowulf the legendary warrior hears of Hrothgar’s monster dilemma and sets out for the embattled land.
2. The watchmen of Dane’s coast wish to evaluate whether Beowulf (armed with weapons and burnished breast plates) is a potential threat, the two exchange in a quick explanation of Beowulf’s business in the region and the hero is eventually permitted to enter, even whilst the watchmen vigilantly scrutinize Beowulf’s vessel as he walks off.
3. Herald Wulfgar instantaneously demands the meaning of their presence to which Beowulf asks a meeting with Hrothgar. Wowed by their armor, Wulfgar informs Hrothgar to which Hrothgar illuminates he is aware of Beowulf’s past feats. It’s surprising to hear the king remembers Beowulf as a boy, the son of Ecgtheow.
4. Pledging to fight unarmed/unclothed….Beowulf essentially connotes not only his confidence but duty for Hrothgar’s assistance to Beowulf’s father. Hrothgar sent tidings to a warring clan (Wulfings) of Beowulf’s father, to which the hero’s father pledged loyalty to the Dane king.
[Feast at Heorot] (lines 491-661, pp. 42-46)
1. Teasing Beowulf for allegedly losing to a past swimming match, Unferth claims that he could/will easily defeat Beowulf in the same challenge. Beowulf, first making light of Unfeth’s obvious contremp inebriation, of course accepts the challenge to prove his worth/name. Beowulf remarks the relevancy of this episode as he honestly expresses he was no match for such a challenge in monster infested waters beforehand, dually pointing out that Unferth couldn’t even hope to survive if he couldn’t defeat a monster like Grendel.
2. Carrying a celebratory gauntlet/chalice, the queen Wealhtheow offered drink to the table’s men, thanking the gods for their sending of Beowulf.
[The Fight with Grendel] (lines 662-835, pp. 46-49)
1. Beowulf, rather then prepping with say the traditional means of sword practice or proper rest, chooses silent and sleepless meditation-esque waiting, awaiting the coming fight.
2. Grendel was to eager eating a Geat as he burst thru Heorot’s threshold. Grendel then begins to fight with Beowulf, meeting the unimaginable, truly inhuman strength of the Geat, the legendary hero wrestling with the beast until ripping off one of the demon’s arm’s, a trophy of victory as the cowardly Grendel flees the mead hall.
[Celebration at Heorot] (lines 836-1250, pp. 49-60)
1. Like Sigmund, Beowulf has slain many a monster, Sigmund vanquishing even a dragon singlehandedly. Beowulf is unlike Sigmund’s acting king Heremod who was unable to defend his sovereign land.
2. Unlike Unferth’s lack of confidence in Beowulf’s abilities (Unferth reluctantly apologizing/embarrassed), Hrothgar is not only pleased by the news of the Geat’s victory, offering him riches and rewards of the like, but actually considers him an honorary son.
3. Hildeburh was given, or taken as tribute to the Dane’s enemy leader Finn. Conspiring as Finn’s wife, Hildeburh eventually gets her wish to return to Dane after Finn is killed by an uprising. The tale is common of the medieval practice for tribes to give women to enemy tribes in order to foster a literal merge of bloodlines in the potential offspring’s of the two tribes.
4. Tried reading the passage (XVII) over and over again of the modern text but couldn’t find any direct speech between the queen and her husband.
5. Offering Beowulf a broad neckalace/armor, Wealhtheow requests her wishes for Beowulf to watch over if not protect her sons’ inevitable rise to the throne.
6. Grendel’s mother is marked in the poem to be lurking outside the hall, no doubt a foreshadow to what havoc she will wreak on the sleeping soldiers.
[Another Attack] (lines 1251-1382, pp. 60-62)
1. Grendel’s mother attacks Heorot in a fit of rage, of vengeance for what they have done to her son, unlike the lust for carnage that Grendel had sought before her.
2. Once again promising riches, Hrothgar requests Beowulf to slay Grendel’s mother. Beowulf accepts this challenge, promising to kill the monster whom had killed Hrothgar’s advisor “Aeschere”.
3. The mere is a noxious but mystical swampland where the abyssal depths have never been seen, and the local fauna seem to flee.
[Beowulf Fights Grendel's Mother] (lines 1383-1650, pp. 63-68)
1. Beowulf asks Hrothgar to remain resilient and strong, confident that the Geat hero shall rid the Dane king of his monster’s mother.
2. With a sharp shot, Beowulf slays a monster within the mere pool, not before finding Aeschere’s decapitated head.
3. Equipped in armor and Unferth’s “infallible” sword “Hrunting”, Beowulf apathetically waits as in his preference preparation.
4. Living near the bottom of the mere, Beowulf has dived down for nearly a day before being attacked at Grendel’s lair threshold being dragged into a hall waterless and without other monsters.
5. Hrunting cant even pierce Grendel’s mother’s hide and is subsequently a useless tool abandoned by Beowulf.
6. The armor of Whealhtheow protects Beowulf from Grendel’s mother’s attempted kill of the hero. This a surprise to Beowulf allowing him to grab a sword, slash her, then escape.
7. Using a massive sword he quickly finishes off Grendel’s mother with a decapitating slash, later doing the same as his sword gleams in crimson victory. Spying the corpse of Grendel Beowulf ironically slashes the demon son’s head, leaving with it as a trophy.
8. The Danes, seeing blood babble on and up upon the surface of the mere, believe Beowulf to be dead, but the Geats remain their, adamant in their confidence for their hero leader, unsurprised but exuberant when he emerges.
[Further Celebration at Heorot] (lines 1651-1798, pp. 68-71)
1. Beowulf gives the head of Grendel as an issue of insurance that Hrothgar’s realms are free of the monster’s terror.
2. Banished from his lands to eventual death by a subject’s hands, Heremod choose materials instead of his fellow man unlike Beowulf according to Hrothgar’s fawning speech of the Geat. This is the lesson imparted unto Beowulf (as he is surely to be a Geat king) always be true to your fellow man before selfish wants.
3. Beowulf returns the ultimately useless Hrunting to Unferth, almost a slight to the Dane character as it most likely represents the persistent lack of confidence Unferth had to Beowulf. 
[Beowulf Returns Home] (lines 1799-2199, pp. 71-79)
1. Hrothgar predicts Beowulf will be a wise and magnanimous ruler of his homelands.
2. Queen Hygd, of Hygelac’s kingdom, differs from the parable Queen Modthryth in that Modthryth was cruel and even torturous to her subjects whilst Hygd was kind/empathetic to the people of her rule.
3. Prophesying in-fighting with the resurgence of bad blood, Beowulf (imo depicts a more calculating, wise aspect of his character) informs Hygelac that the potential marriage of Hrothgar’s child to the once adversarial “Heathobroads” will only end with more conflict between the Danes/ Heathobroads. A misguided attempt at fostering peace by marriage/bloodline merging as illustrated in the Finn fable.
4. Aside from embelshing the power of Grendel (though Grendel was indeed monstrous) Beowulf retells hi story relatively accurate, again embellishments aside.
5. Beowulf happily accepted his kings gifts including vast sums of riches and “hides assigned him seven thousand,with house and high-seat” (in other words land?)
[The Dragon Wakes] (lines 2200-2509, pp. 79-86)
1. In the fifty years or so that has passed, king Hygelac has departed, Beowulf has been entrusted with the crown reigning over his Geatland province, yet a monster has emerged much more horrifying then Grendel, a dragon now terrorizes the hero’s homeland.
2. Enraged by the theft of a jewel adorned goblet, one placed centuries ago by a lone survivor of a forgotten race, the dragon did not care about the thief’s motivations (a slave forced by his master to steal) and subsequently wrought fire, relentlessy reduced the Geat kingdom to smoldering grey ash.
3. Not even Beowulf’s throne hall was safe from the dragon’s fiery wrath, the flying beast burning the place, it to being reduced to ash.
4. Beowulf aged and tired is not aware of the reasons why the dragon attacks. He ponders what he must have done to enrage the gods, to deserve such calamities. Even in his age, Beowulf commissions a shield to fight the dragon, the hero still believing he could defeat a monster without assistance, just like he had slain Grendel half a century ago.  I’m speculating that Beowulf’s battle with the dragon will be his last…
5. Dying in battle, king Hygelac was honored by Beowulf’s loyalty even in death as the Geat hero refused Hygd’s offer of the throne, Beowulf not wanting to disrupt the order of succession already established by bloodline.
6. Securing vengeance for Hygelac’s son’s death, Beowulf decimated the Swedes who had robbed the boy of his life.
7. Accompanied by twelve men, Beowulf set out for the dragon’s barrow.
8. Herebeald was “accidentally” killed by his brother Haethkyn, their father king Herethel could only descend, mire and wallow within a void of grief, especially when Haethkyn is sent to the gallows for his brother’s death. Beowulf laments his own grief before slaughtering Swedes in a fit of vengeance.
[Beowulf Attacks the Dragon] (lines 2510-2820, pp. 86-92)
1. Dubbing it a shame if he was to fall alone, Beowulf, claiming it to be an honorable end, orders his men to fight (and undoubtedly die) if he too falls to the dragon’s might.
2. Beowulf struggling against the dragon’s flames (his strength sapped by age), Wiglaf calls upon the help of his fellow comrades to help aid their Geat king, calling them cowardly as the soldiers forgo their honor/oath in a flight of unabashed terror.
3. Trading fatal blows, the dragon (with venom-tipped fangs) bites Beowulf’s neck, Beowulf returning a blow plunging a dagger deep into the dragon’s vulnerable underbelly.
4. Wanting to see the gold he has freed for his kindom’s men, Wiglaf obeys Beowulf’s dying words, retrieving it for the dying Geat. Asking Wiglaf to remain strong, to fufill the void, the vacuum that will be left by his death, Beowulf gives Wiglaf his gold collar, breastplate, a token that will make Wiglaf a king. Desiring Burial in “Beowulf’s Barrow” the legendary hero passes on, ready to meet his fellow, fallen, ancestors.
[Beowulf's Funeral] (lines 2821-3182, pp. 92-99)
1. Wiglaf predicts inevitable invasion, doom for his Geatland knowing the cowardly companions will not be able to protect the kingdom as Beowulf the fallen had.
2. The messenger messages of impending invasion by a bevy of hordes, one of which being the rival Swedes. Ongentheow (after killing Haethkyn apparently, im confused I thought Haethkyn was hung for accidentally killing his brother?) futilely retreated but was eventually hunted down and killed, his armor given to the once king Hygelac. The messenger essentially says it would be dishonorable/useless to keep the gold and advises the riches to be put upon Beowulf’s funeral pyre.
3. Wiglaf demanded the people to view the gold, the literal costs of Beowulf’s death a second time, recounting the leaders dying words/wishes.
4. The dragon is disposed of, cast of into the watery deeps.
5. Disposing of the gold not melted by Beowulf’s funeral (byway of burying), the commemoration/memorial of Geat was exercised by ten day services (atop a seaside ridge), countless horseman riding in grief, the actual funeral ironically concluded by the cowardly companions circling the funeral pyre, fearing what will lye in their inevitable deaths after such dishonorable deeds.
6. The people titled Beowulf as such “…of men he was mildest and most beloved, to his kin the kindest, keenest for praise.” Quite different from the romanticized, stoic ideal of an infallible, larger-then-life military hero archetype, Beowulf is a testament to, a landmark of a dynamic character/hero, a true “human” hero…though with the strength of thirty men.

Saturday, August 25, 2012

1987 AP Essay Question #1


In George Elliot’s time leisure was viewed as an unnecessary waste of time, I mean why spend time relaxing when you could be doing something productive like improving the house or working. Look at society today there are so many things in this world that focus on the idea of leisure. For example a cell phone is a simple device that’s purpose is to communicate with other people but they have evolved to let us do so much more. Read books, check e-mail, text message, and even connect to the internet it’s now all there in the palm of your hand. How would the past generation view this? More than likely they would disprove in the use of resources and time but what exactly has caused such a different view in the morals and values of these, what seems like completely different societies.
  Let’s look at the past, in older days a high value was put on work and productivity. That’s why in most cases both parents worked and kids had jobs at young ages. Look at the stereotypical movies of today that portray the past as a happy nothing’s wrong kind of mentality of yesteryear, where a son comes to his dad chipper and happy because he made a quarter on his newspaper route. Other than work a high priority was family. So when everyone wasn’t working they were spending good quality time with one another around the dinner table or out in public. Not to say the generation of the past didn’t have any forms of leisure, for instance books were often read but not for the same reasons that we do today. Books were read to teach people things or instruct them on certain things. Now where do we start to see the divergence in mentality?
  The modern world as we know it has become extremely convenient for us, I mean think about it today’s youth have a bevy of tool at their disposal and we use them to their fullest extent almost every waking hour of the day. For example privacy and discreetness has become a thing of the past. The things that our society learns these days and at such a young age as well would have been damn near taboo back in the day. That’s because there is no information that we cannot grasp due to things such as the internet, nationwide television, and even the daily news that keeps us informed on everything that’s not just going on in our country but around the world. But back to how leisure is perceived as a way to get away and retreat to places that makes us fell calm or excited. Think about it when we are in our homes are we really close to our families? Or are we tucked away in our rooms secluding ourselves with the leisure that we hold so dear?


   

Tuesday, August 21, 2012

Reflections on week one

1.There are a few logistical issues that are going on in my life that may affect my experience in the class but for the most part I am tech savvy and up to the challenge that this course is defiantly going to offer me. There should be no tech issues as i have my own computer that I can access at any time of the day.

2.To date I haven't had any eye opening learning experiences that have changed me in any significant way that I can think of right off the bat. Most of the time when I approach learning there isn't much room in my mind that I open up because I have become jaded in the sense that I have come to think of teachers as something like machines that run over the same routines day after day and year after year. I am hoping much like my sophomore year this class will show me different.

3.I feel I'm most excited about the new approaches to learning and getting to to be involved with things that are relevant to me and my generation. I am looking forward to learning about new ways of expanding my knowledge and growing as a student before college. The class will definitely force me to put effort in to all of my work therefore it is going to better me in the way that it will get me to be accurate and take a certain pride in all of my work throughout the year.

Comments on Sacratic Seminar

So there wasn't to much I wanted to say in there first place the only real comment i had was, maybe you don't exactly have a right to your opinion but you have a right to your own way of thinking. When you think about it your entitled to your thoughts and perception of things and to this world however you don't have the right to correct or change the perception of someone else. Any way that is all I have to say on the subject for the moment.

Friday, August 3, 2012

Assignment #1

  I'm taking this course mostly because i was in Preston's honors English class my sophomore year and it was one of my best years in terms of learning. I enjoyed the things we explored and experimented with during that year so i'm returning in hopes that it will be similar to the previous year.
  I don't have to much to be excited about at the moment but hopefully that will change in the coming weeks. The only thing that I'm nervous about is the work load but if its anything like last time it shouldn't be that hard to manage and organize myself.
  My goal for the course is to learn enough to pass the AP exam with nothing less than a 4 (my current score being a 2) My only other goal is to achieve and maintain and A through out  the course.
  By the end i expect my lexicon and ways of thinking to be stretched and vastly improved to the point to where ill be able to apply what I have learned practically to the real world and my actual everyday life.