Tuesday, January 8, 2013

Hitchhikers Lit Anal. #5



“Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy” by Douglas Adams is about Arthur dent a human from earth that is awakened one morning by a construction team trying to tear down his house to make way for a highway. Arthurs friend ford prefect comes and explains that a race called the Vogons are going to demolish earth to ironically build a space highway. The two escape on to a Vogon Ship and are then jettisoned in to space where they are picked up by Zaphod Beeblebrox president of the Galaxy. The group encounters dangers and hijinks. They eventually come to a supercomputer called deep though which was asked the question to the meaning of life to witch it calculated was 42. The answer was unsatisfactory therefore deep thought constructed earth which would help calculate the question that would give the answer some kind of meaning. Unfortunately just before the Earth had completed its calculation it was blown up by the Vogons. A pair of mice that escaped with Arthur when he first left reveals themselves to be sentient beings and curious about the meaning of life offer to buy Arthurs brain. He refuses which gets him in to trouble his friends rescue him in the nick of time. The group then decides to go have lunch at “The Restaurant at the End of the Universe” to which the book ends and leads to the sequel. The theme is that the answers were all seeking are right in front of us as long as were not so blinded to look. Douglas’s tone is playful, serious, and whimsical as this is a crazy tale of total mind F****.

  Like many other authors and novels the author approaches characterization in two ways direct and indirect the most common and easiest of these to point out is when he describes physical attributes of the characters like the fact that Arthur is British or Ford is Black. Then through the characters actions we grow to know how their minds work and their personalities which fill the rest of the characters profiles. The author’s syntax and diction remain the same throughout regardless of what he is describing.  No Arthur remains the same neurotic constantly opposing and questioning persona that he is except for the fact that maybe he is a little bit more accepting of change. There was something about this book that just didn’t grab me so unfortunately after reading the characters just remained words on a page that didn’t make me feel for them or grab me as a reader.

No comments:

Post a Comment