I think on a very big over all view you are correct and a very good interpretation of the speech. However I think if it were analyzed deeper I think his words could be interpreted in different ways. But good job :D
I agree with Spanish for candy, uh....(jk Dulce, i had to). On a holistic level you hit the right beats on Hamlet's motivations as conveyed via to be or not to be.on a side note...yo, you okay? those ghosts with jackhammers sound like they're getting closer
I would just like to point out that you needed to remix something from Act 3, it didn't have to be the soliloquy. Overall, short enough to keep things interesting, but long enough to reach all points. Though some might argue that your interpretation isn't "deep" enough or something along those lines...
I think on a very big over all view you are correct and a very good interpretation of the speech. However I think if it were analyzed deeper I think his words could be interpreted in different ways. But good job :D
ReplyDeleteI agree with Spanish for candy, uh....(jk Dulce, i had to). On a holistic level you hit the right beats on Hamlet's motivations as conveyed via to be or not to be.on a side note...yo, you okay? those ghosts with jackhammers sound like they're getting closer
ReplyDeleteI like how you metioned the key conponets of it but I think you should also talk about some of the troubles that is making him think this way.
ReplyDeleteI would just like to point out that you needed to remix something from Act 3, it didn't have to be the soliloquy. Overall, short enough to keep things interesting, but long enough to reach all points. Though some might argue that your interpretation isn't "deep" enough or something along those lines...
ReplyDelete